🤍 @ati_ti7 #TopMiata #JDM #Mazda #Miata #MX5 #roadster #nbmiata
How You Can Help
It's the question I'm getting most often. This was just up on Twitter:
Go to
Hit Donate, and when it asks where you want to donate to, Film and Television.
OP you left out the best part
Always reblog wholesome batdad
Someone checking the “baby’s” DNA against a database. “Oh my god. That baby is a clone of Bruce Wayne.”
This is THEW ONLY Batman worth a damn. Every brooding Batman can suck it. Including Twilight Bat.
Anonymous asked:
This is kind of off topic, but I didn't feel comfortable asking a bisexual person this as I've heard abro people say some people feel as though abrosexuality invalidates bi people. I've been trying to figure out if I'm abro or bi and wanted to ask if you knew whether asexuality could be somehow part of the bi-cycle? I feel strongly gay, strongly straight, and strongly bi/omni at different times, which would I think fit into the bi-cycle. But sometimes I feel ace/ace-spec and I stop being so sure
abrosexuality answered:
Honestly I consider abro to be mostly like bisexuality but with a prettier flag ! IMO the labels overlap enough to be considered more or less the same thing to some people & I think pushing any given definition of a label as the Right One is a lame idea, it’s whatever it means to you & different labels don’t have to mean you don’t share similar experiences. But to actually answer your question, I don’t know. I’ve never looked into bisexuality all that much , sorry >_<. i do think it’s fine if you decide to use either (or both) !!
This isn’t wholly helpful. While there IS overlap between bisexuality and abrosexuality, it’s not the same thing. Abrosexuality is fluid, Bisexuality isn’t. If you’re questioning whether you’re bisexual or Abro; you probably lean MORE on the Abrosexual scale - but then again; it took me thirty+ years to work out that I am INDEED abrosexual, I went through the ENTIRE alphabet of pride until figuring it out.
Bisexual: I know my gender and I know which two or more genders that I like.
Abrosexual: I know my gender; My sexuality is the fluid one.
Genderfluid: My gender not my sexuality is a mix of expressions and social presentations.
Abrosexuality DOES NOT erase Bisexuality and vice versa. Anyone who says it does is a gatekeeping a-hole.
I hope that helps.
Writing about a child rapist did not make Vladimir Nabokov a child rapist.
Writing about an authoritarian theocracy did not make Margaret Atwood an authoritarian theocrat.
Writing about adultery did not make Leo Tolstoy an adulterer.
Writing about a ghost did not make Toni Morrison a ghost.
Writing about a murderer did not make Fyodor Dostoevsky a murderer.
Writing about a teenage addict did not make Isabel Allende a teenage addict.
Writing about dragons and ice zombies did not make George R.R. Martin either of those things.
Writing about rich heiresses, socially awkward bachelors, and cougar widows did not make Jane Austen any of those things.
Writing about people who can control earthquakes did not make N.K. Jemisin able to control earthquakes.
Writing about your favorite characters and/or ships in situations that you choose does not make you a bad person.
It’s a shame that in this day and age these things need to be said.
Or, in short: the narrator =/ the author.
You know what else is a shame? This nowadays tendency of putting on the author the responsibility of teaching their readers morality.
Authors are allowed to write morally ambiguous characters.
Authors are allowed to write downright despicable characters - and guess what they are even allowed to make despicable characters charismatic and likeble and the protagonists of their stories if they wish - because absolute monsters exist only under the bed.
It is not up to the author to spoonfeed the readers about morality and Yes I know this character did a bad thing and I am going going to show it in the story and make other characters call them out of it and– Bullshit.
The authors should be able to write what they want without having thousands of people jumping and their throats claiming to know them, their ideas and their morality based on what they write.
It’s not up to the author to teach you about what is right and what is wrong.
It’s not up to the author to teach you about what is right and what is wrong.
The tags speak the truth.
top tier character-building device in pokemon games is when a seemingly antagonistic character has a golbat on their team and then later has it evolved into a crobat, which requires significant friendship, thus signalling that the character was always a kind person inside (plumeria), is growing past their issues and learning to be kinder (silver), may hold a spark of kindness that undermines their cold and calculating image (cyrus), etc etc
Meanwhile, Ghetsis—who is an antagonist who pretends to be an advocate for Pokemon rights—faces off against you with an under-leveled Hydreigon, which in the canon lore of the series only happens when someone forces evolution early, and that Hydreigon uses a full-power Frustration in B2W2, suggesting that it absolutely loathes Ghetsis.
For any non-pokemon players:
In pokemon games, there’s a hidden stat called friendship, which maxes out at 255 points; there are two (major) moves that are affected by this:
Return, which gets stronger the higher a pokemon’s friendship stat is, capping at 102 base power with 255 friendship (for context, hyper beam has a base power of 150)
And frustration, which does the opposite, getting stronger the lower a pokemon’s friendship stat is, capping out at 102 base power when the pokemon is at 0 friendship
The EXTRA fucked up thing is, almost NO pokemon has a base friendship of 0. The only pokemon that do are legendary pokemon and buneary. So Ghetsis actively lowered his Hydreigon’s friendship, and the only way to do that in-game is to let your pokemon faint often without using healing items on them
In other words Ghetsis is a major cunt
wh
what’s up with buneary???
Buneary fucking hates you by default. It’s also another friendship-dependent evolution line.
for others who are clueless in the poking men, this is the tiny bunny that fucking hates you
Bunneary hates your guts with the force of Gods
Things fanfic is reputed for inserting into the source material:
- Sex
Things fanfic actually inserts into the source material:
- Sex
- Holding hands
- Bizarre misunderstandings
- Meticulous descriptions of food and clothing
- The author’s unaddressed traumas
- Found family
- Plausible explanations for existing plot holes
- Additional plot holes
- Exciting new frontiers in speculative physics, economics, chemistry, biology, zoology, psychology, theology, and/or ontology
- Tax evasion
- Gender
- Very bad puns
I painted one side blue
and turned my back to the rest.
Left the brush, stiff-bristled
on the window ledge.
I forgave one little thing
and turned my back to the rest.
Let them pour their guilty whispers
in my sleeping ears.
I made one simple plan,
and turned my back to the rest.
And to prove it all in vain,
I painted one side blue.
"Simple plans" by Conrad Harris
“A few years ago Vietnam demanded that Facebook start censoring anti-government posts or really any criticism of the government or be taken off line in the country. Essentially Vietnam insisted that Facebook delegate content moderation within Vietnam to the government of Vietnam. Zuckerberg personally made the decision to agree to the demands. He apparently justified this on the reasoning that Facebook disappearing in Vietnam would take away the speech rights of more people than the censorship would. If that sounds like self-justifying nonsense thank you for reading closely.”
—
A Revealing Look At Zuckerberg
Zuckerberg is just straight up evil. He is incomprehensibly evil. Like comic book villain levels of evil.